Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Daiwa 23 Revros LT
Spinning
71.00 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight270g / 9.52oz
Line retireve per crank99 centimeter / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-CXH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs) and ball bearings (4). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa 23 Revros LT?
Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CXHX
- With a great drag score 10 out of 10 (12kg / 26,46lbs), the reel is built to handle big fish confidently.. whatever the setting, freshwater or inshore salt
- With a score like 8.2 out of 10 (270g / 9,52oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Delphin ELIXIR 4000X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Shimano FX 2500 FCX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 4000-XHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-CXH(U)X vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX
