Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQR 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Both Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X and Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag score below average overall, indicating some compromises in durability and total score. If you must choose between them, Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95cm / 37.40 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Delphin CarbonIX 3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 6000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 5000D-CXHX vs Delphin CarbonIX 3000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 2500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano 21 Sahara FJ C3000HGFJX
