Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750
Spinning
47.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.71 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank58 centimeter / 22.83 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeQR 750
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/100
Conclusion
Both Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X and Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag score below average overall, indicating some compromises in durability and total score. If you must choose between them, Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X offers a slight edge in maximum drag, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95cm / 37.40 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.83 out of 10 (175g / 6,17oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- A bearing score of 5 out of 10 (3) gets the job done (basic but dependable) especially for beginners or casual anglers
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Penn Battle III 8000 HSX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Catana 1000 RC


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Penn Battle III 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X
