Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.88 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/227
Conclusion
Both Delphin CarbonIX 2000X and Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag score below average overall, indicating some compromises in durability and total score. If you must choose between them, Delphin CarbonIX 2000X offers a slight edge in ball bearings, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Delphin CarbonIX?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95cm / 37.40 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Delphin CarbonIX 2000X
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa RX LT 1000X
