Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin INKS 2000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Delphin INKS
Spinning
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.53 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag-
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank-
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €21.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/400
Conclusion
Delphin INKS 2000X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (3+1) and weight (250g / 8,82oz). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Delphin INKS 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Delphin INKS?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95cm / 37.40 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Delphin INKS 2000X
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000-CXHX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Daiwa BG 3000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa BG 3000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Delphin ELIXIR 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX


Daiwa BG 3500X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX
