Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/200
Conclusion
Both Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X and Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag score below average overall, indicating some compromises in durability and total score. If you must choose between them, Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X offers a slight edge in ball bearings, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95cm / 37.40 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Delphin SHARX 4000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Delphin SHARX 4000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Penn Battle III 2000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 FJX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa Regal LT 2500 DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Penn Battle III 2000X


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag
