Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/200
Conclusion
Both Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X and Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag score below average overall, indicating some compromises in durability and total score. If you must choose between them, Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X offers a slight edge in ball bearings, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95cm / 37.40 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX


Shimano Aero BB C3000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X


Penn FIERCE IV 2000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2000 S-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2000X


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 PGX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C2000SCX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Daiwa BG 5000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 5000D-CX


Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 4000-CX
