Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210
Conclusion
Both Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X and Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag score below average overall, indicating some compromises in durability and total score. If you must choose between them, Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X offers a slight edge in ball bearings, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95cm / 37.40 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- With a score like 8.11 out of 10 (284g / 10,02oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Sienna 4000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 3000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX
