Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210
Conclusion
Both Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X and Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag score below average overall, indicating some compromises in durability and total score. If you must choose between them, Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X offers a slight edge in ball bearings, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95cm / 37.40 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- With a score like 8.11 out of 10 (284g / 10,02oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Delphin INKS 5000X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Shimano FX 1000 FCX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 3000-C / JB4 0.19MM YELLOW 3000-CX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 1000X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX vs Shimano FX 1000 FCX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X
