Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210
Conclusion
Both Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X and Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag score below average overall, indicating some compromises in durability and total score. If you must choose between them, Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X offers a slight edge in ball bearings, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95cm / 37.40 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- With a score like 8.11 out of 10 (284g / 10,02oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX


Daiwa BG 2000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500X-HX


Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 2500X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 5000 XGFJX
