Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin REDIX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Delphin REDIX
Feeder And Match
41.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.83 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight440g / 15oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings6+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €39.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size6000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/605
Conclusion
Both Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Delphin REDIX score below average overall, indicating some compromises in total score, ergonomics and durability. If you must choose between them, Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag offers a slight edge in line retrieve per crank, while Delphin REDIX may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Delphin REDIX?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95cm / 37.40 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Delphin REDIX
- With a ball bearing score of 9.33 out of 10 (6+1), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2000X vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000HGAX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa BG 6500X


Daiwa GS LTD 4000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX


Daiwa TD Match 4012X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
