Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Mitchell MX2 Spinning
Spinning
3000x
63.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.14 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag7.4kg / 16,31lbs
Weight258g / 9.1oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandMITCHELL
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.31/125
Conclusion
Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (7,4kg / 16,31lbs) and ball bearings (5). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Mitchell MX2 Spinning?
Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (7,4kg / 16,31lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.28 out of 10 (258g / 9,1oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000FEX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Delphin IXTREK 3000X


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sienna 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT6000X


Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 4000-CX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX


Shimano Stella FK 2500X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Delphin IXTREK 3000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX
