Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.59 out of 10) and maximum drag (4kg / 8,82lbs). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn 2020 Clash II?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95cm / 37.40 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX


Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Shimano Aero 4000X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX


Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R vs Shimano Catana FE 2500X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Aero 4000X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2000D-XH 2000D-XHX vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Shimano Stella FK 4000 MX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX
