Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Penn Battle III Long Cast
Spinning
8000 Lcx
53.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.0:1
Maximum drag13.6kg / 29,98lbs
Weight748g / 26.39oz
Line retireve per crank94 centimeter / 37.01 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000 LC
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/485
Conclusion
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) and ball bearings (6). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn Battle III Long Cast?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX
- For 8 out of 10 (13,6kg / 29,98lbs) in drag score, the reel holds up well when you're battling strong fish or fishing near heavy cover
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX


Shimano Vanford FA C3000SDHAX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 5000XGFEX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 1000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CXHX
