Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.54 out of 10
Ergonomics5.91 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight535g / 18.87oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €161.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size30
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 400/0.4
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (7) and weight (535g / 18,87oz). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX
- Scoring 8.22 out of 10 (535g / 18,87oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2500SX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Sahara 4000 R vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX vs Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag
