Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (7) and weight (545g / 19,22oz). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.18 out of 10 (545g / 19,22oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Shimano Sahara 500 FI vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Shimano Torium 16PGAX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Tiagra 50WAX


Shimano Vanquish FC C5000XGCX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WAX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X
