Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (7) and weight (545g / 19,22oz). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.18 out of 10 (545g / 19,22oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 12IIX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano Tiagra 130AX vs Shimano Aero BB 4000X


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Shimano Tiagra 16X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX
