Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Talica II 10IIX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Shimano Talica II
Multireels
88.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.53 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag9kg / 19.84lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank97 centimeter / 38.19 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €420.00
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size10II
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 20/270
Conclusion
Shimano Talica II 10IIX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and maximum drag (9kg / 19,84lbs). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Talica II 10IIX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Shimano Talica II?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8.2 out of 10 (5.3:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
Shimano Talica II 10IIX
- At a maximum drag of 9kg / 19,84lbs (scoring 5.51 out of 10), the reel has a modest drag setup which is enough for smaller fish or relaxed situations where finesse matters more
- Scoring 8.27 out of 10 (520g / 18,34oz), this reel is impressively light for a multireel
- Scoring 8 out of 10 (6), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Shimano Torium 16HGA / Right handX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX vs Daiwa TANASENSOR


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Daiwa Tanacom 750


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 5000D-C 5000D-CX


Shimano Catana 1000 RC vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa TANASENSOR vs Delphin ELIXIR 2000X


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX
