Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX

Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
43.10 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight380g / 13.40oz
Line retireve per crank95cm / 37.40 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €19.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/270m

Shimano Ultegra
Spinning
76.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3kg / 6.61lbs
Weight180g / 6.35oz
Line retireve per crank69 centimeter / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €125.50
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel sizeC2000SD
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/105
Conclusion
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and durability (8.5 out of 10). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Shimano Ultegra?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- A high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (95cm / 37.40 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
- Designed with a light drag at 5 out of 10 (3kg / 6,61lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.8 out of 10 (180g / 6,35oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa Regal LT 2000 DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Shimano Vanford FA 2500SHGAX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX
