Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin CarbonIX 2000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
18.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight630g / 22.22oz
Line retireve per crank99cm / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.35mm/370m

Delphin CarbonIX
Spinning
49.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.88 out of 10
Ergonomics6.3 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight210g / 7.41oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €42.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.12/227
Conclusion
Both Delphin CarbonIX 2000X and Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag score below average overall, indicating some compromises in durability and total score. If you must choose between them, Delphin CarbonIX 2000X offers a slight edge in ball bearings, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Delphin CarbonIX?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99cm / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Delphin CarbonIX 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.6 out of 10 (210g / 7,41oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX


Daiwa Freams LT 6000D-HX vs Cormoran Spoon Trout 8PiF


Shimano Super 4000 GT RD vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X


Shimano Sedona FJ C2000SHGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 2000X vs Shimano FX 2500 HG FCX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 1000D(U)X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 4000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX
