Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
18.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight630g / 22.22oz
Line retireve per crank99cm / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.35mm/370m

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.70 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.67 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/200
Conclusion
Both Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X and Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag score below average overall, indicating some compromises in durability and total score. If you must choose between them, Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X offers a slight edge in ball bearings, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99cm / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 2000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.33 out of 10 (250g / 8,82oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 SX vs Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2500X


Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 2500 FJX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano 19 Stella 20000 PGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2500-XHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC
