Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
18.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight630g / 22.22oz
Line retireve per crank99cm / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.35mm/370m

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210
Conclusion
Both Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X and Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag score below average overall, indicating some compromises in durability and total score. If you must choose between them, Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X offers a slight edge in ball bearings, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99cm / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.11 out of 10 (284g / 10,02oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Sienna 1000X


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX


Shimano Ultegra C2000SHGDX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK X LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano 21 Sustain 4000 FJX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa BG 2500X


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa BG 2500X vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Shimano 20 Stella 18000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX
