Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X

Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
18.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight630g / 22.22oz
Line retireve per crank99cm / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.35mm/370m

Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG
Spinning
48.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.72 out of 10
Ergonomics6.05 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag0lbs
Weight284g / 10.02oz
Line retireve per crank0 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDELPHIN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €32.95
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/210
Conclusion
Both Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X and Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag score below average overall, indicating some compromises in durability and total score. If you must choose between them, Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X offers a slight edge in ball bearings, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- A high retrieve rate of 9.4 out of 10 (99cm / 38.98 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.11 out of 10 (284g / 10,02oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Cormoran Sportline 2PiF vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2000S-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Ultegra C3000DX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 4000MHGCX


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Shimano 19 Stella 14000 XGX


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Delphin BRONZ 2000X


Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2000DX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Delphin BRONZ 2000X vs Mitchell 300 4000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X
