Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R

Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
18.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.59 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.6:1
Maximum drag-
Weight630g / 22.22oz
Line retireve per crank99cm / 38.98 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €25.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.35mm/370m

Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
Spinning
29.20 out of 100
Value for money2 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight375g / 13.23oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €53.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130
Conclusion
Both Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R and Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag score below average overall, indicating some compromises in durability, total score and ergonomics. If you must choose between them, Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R offers a slight edge in ball bearings, while Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag may still be worth considering depending on specific preferences.
What's the difference between Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag and Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R?
Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag
- Decent value at €25.33, it covers the basics, making it a great option for beginners or casual spinning setups
Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Shimano Sienna 1000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Delphin YUPIE vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano Stella FK 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Shimano Sienna 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 1000FJX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000HGFJX vs Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X vs Penn Battle III 3000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 5000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2000 / JB4 0.13MM YELOW 2000X vs Delphin YUPIE


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX
