Mitchell 300 4000X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX

Mitchell 300, 4000, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 1428054
Mitchell 300
Spinning
4000x
55.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.11 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag6.4kg / 14,11lbs
Weight268g / 9.45oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandMITCHELL
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €45.50
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size4000
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofil-
Daiwa 22 Exist LT, PC 2500D-H, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10102-251
Daiwa 22 Exist LT
Spinning
95.00 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.43 out of 10
Gear ratio5.7:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight170g / 6oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter
Ball bearings12

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €661.33
  • Is saltwater resistantYes
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel sizePC 2500D-H
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150

Conclusion

Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX clearly outshines Mitchell 300 4000X, offering significantly better performance in durability (9.5 out of 10) and total score (9.5 out of 10). While Mitchell 300 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.

What's the difference between Mitchell 300 and Daiwa 22 Exist LT?

Mitchell 300 4000X

  • Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency

Daiwa 22 Exist LT PC 2500D-HX

  • Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.