Mitchell 300 4000X vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX

Mitchell 300
Spinning
4000x
55.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.11 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag6.4kg / 14,11lbs
Weight268g / 9.45oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandMITCHELL
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €45.50
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-

Penn Slammer IV
Spinning
8500 Hsx
70.80 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag22.6kg / 49,82lbs
Weight870g / 30.69oz
Line retireve per crank127 centimeter / 50 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €294.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8500 HS
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.46/415
Conclusion
Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX edges out Mitchell 300 4000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (5.5 out of 10) and the maximum drag (22,6kg / 49,82lbs). Still, Mitchell 300 4000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 268g / 9,45oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Mitchell 300 and Penn Slammer IV?
Mitchell 300 4000X
- With a score like 8.21 out of 10 (268g / 9,45oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Shimano FX 4000 FCX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 6000DX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Delphin SHARX 6000X


Daiwa BG 5000X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Penn Sargus II Spinning 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT2000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000X
