Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Mitchell 300
Spinning
4000x
55.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.11 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag6.4kg / 14,11lbs
Weight268g / 9.45oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandMITCHELL
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €45.50
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 edges out Mitchell 300 4000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and the durability (5.73 out of 10). Still, Mitchell 300 4000X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 6 and a weight of 268g / 9,45oz, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Mitchell 300 and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Mitchell 300 4000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.21 out of 10 (268g / 9,45oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 4000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Cardiff 201A vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano TALICA II A 20IIAX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Abu GARCIA Zenon 1000 SX


Shimano Stella FK 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Cardiff 201A


Shimano Stella FK 2500 HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000FJX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 4000D-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano TORIUM 40 PGAX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX
