Mitchell 300 4000X vs Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Mitchell 300
Spinning
4000x
55.70 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.92 out of 10
Ergonomics6.11 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag6.4kg / 14,11lbs
Weight268g / 9.45oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandMITCHELL
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €45.50
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-

Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A
Multireels
79.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.89 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.1:1
Maximum drag25kg / 55.12lbs
Weight1520g / 53.62oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €849.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size9000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/900
Conclusion
Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A clearly outshines Mitchell 300 4000X, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (25kg / 55,12lbs) and line retrieve per crank (88 centimeter / 34.65 inch). While Mitchell 300 4000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Mitchell 300 and Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A?
Mitchell 300 4000X
- Thanks to its 7 out of 10 (5.1:1) gear ratio, the reel offers a strong balance between torque and quick retrieval
- With a score like 8.21 out of 10 (268g / 9,45oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8.67 out of 10 (6) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Torium 20PGAX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 2000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX


Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 2000 NR PGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 1000X


Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF vs Shimano Twin Power FE 3000XGFEX
