Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X

Mitchell 308 PRO
Spinning
2000x
50.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag6.4kg / 14,11lbs
Weight239g / 8.43oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandMITCHELL
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
36.50 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.38 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight185g / 6.53oz
Line retireve per crank64 centimeter / 25.2 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €20.30
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.16/240
Conclusion
Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X, offering significantly better performance in line retrieve per crank (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) and gear ratio (5.8:1). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Mitchell 308 PRO and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (6,4kg / 14,11lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 1000X
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X


Delphin IXTREK 4000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000PGFEX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Shimano Sedona FJ 4000XGFJX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Daiwa BG 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Penn 2020 Clash II 2000X vs Daiwa BG 4000X


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Sedona 2500 HG FI


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500-XHX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R


Shimano Sedona 8000 FI vs Delphin BRONZ 6000X


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Sahara 3000S R
