Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Mitchell 308 PRO
Spinning
2000x
50.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag6.4kg / 14,11lbs
Weight239g / 8.43oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandMITCHELL
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.60 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.51 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight520g / 18.34oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €154.10
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size25N
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 315/0.32
Conclusion
Both Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X and Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X offers a gear ratio of 5.8:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX stands out for a ball bearings of 7. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Mitchell 308 PRO and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (6,4kg / 14,11lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Aero C3000X vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Tiagra 30WLRSAX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 4000-C / JB4 0.25MM YELLOW 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 2500D-XH 2500D-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Shimano Tyrnos 30 II vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 2500X


Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 2000DX


Shimano Torium 16HGAL / Left-handedX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX
