Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Shimano Sahara 500 FI

Mitchell 308 PRO
Spinning
2000x
50.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag6.4kg / 14,11lbs
Weight239g / 8.43oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandMITCHELL
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-

Shimano Sahara 500 FI
Spinning
44.20 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.42 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.52 lbs
Weight175g / 6.17oz
Line retireve per crank69cm / 27.17 inch
Ball bearings4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €62.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size500
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.20/110 lb/yds: 2/190. 4/100, 6/60
Conclusion
Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 500 FI, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (6,4kg / 14,11lbs) and line retrieve per crank (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch). While Shimano Sahara 500 FI may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Mitchell 308 PRO and Shimano Sahara 500 FI?
Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (6,4kg / 14,11lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Shimano Sahara 500 FI
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (4 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Daiwa Fuego LT 3000D-CX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 PGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2000SFEX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 HGX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 2500X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 1000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500FEX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Delphin INKS 3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2500X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 1000X
