Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Mitchell 308 PRO
Spinning
50.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag6.4kg / 14,11lbs
Weight239g / 8.43oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandMITCHELL
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
Multireels
86.00 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.58:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight800g / 28219oz
Line retireve per crank55 centimeter / 21654 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €599.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/500
Conclusion
Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) clearly outshines Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and durability (9.5 out of 10). While Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U) is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Mitchell 308 PRO and Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)?
Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X
- With a score like 8.41 out of 10 (239g / 8,43oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)
- With a high retrieve rate of 9 out of 10 (8), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 2000X vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Shimano Vanquish FC C3000MHGCX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Shimano Complex XR 2500 HGX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Penn International VISW 30 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 10IIX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 4000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 8IIX vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Shimano TLD II A 20 IIX
