Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Mitchell 308 PRO
Spinning
50.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag6.4kg / 14,11lbs
Weight239g / 8.43oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandMITCHELL
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-

Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
Seafishing
54.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.88 out of 10
Ergonomics5.51 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight625g / 22.05oz
Line retireve per crank103 centimeter / 40.55 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €125.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300
Conclusion
Both Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X and Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X offers a line retrieve per crank of 77 centimeter / 30.31 inch, while Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R stands out for a ball bearings of 3. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Mitchell 308 PRO and Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R?
Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X
- 6 out of 10 (77 centimeter / 30.31 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
Daiwa Crosscast Surf 35 SCW QD Type R
- With a premium bearing count of 3 scoring 5 out of 10, our reel offers a high-end smoothness and durability, ready for all different environments
Similar comparisons

Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 HGX vs Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX


Penn 2020 Clash II 4000 HSX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 HGX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 HGX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Daiwa 20 Luvias LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano Spheros SW A 18000 HGX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 XGX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa RX LT 2500X


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 PGX


Daiwa RX LT 2500X vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 8000 HGX


Daiwa BG MQ 3000D-XHX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 8000 HGX


Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Certate SW 18000-HX


Shimano Twin Power FE 2500SHGFEX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 3000-CX
