Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Mitchell 308 PRO
Spinning
50.60 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag6.4kg / 14,11lbs
Weight239g / 8.43oz
Line retireve per crank77 centimeter / 30.31 inch
Ball bearings10
Technical Specifications
- BrandMITCHELL
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €56.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil-

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40 LH
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationLeft
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X and Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X offers a gear ratio of 5.8:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX stands out for a ball bearings of 7. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Mitchell 308 PRO and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Mitchell 308 PRO 2000X
- A fast gear ratio of 9.2 out of 10 (5.8:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (6,4kg / 14,11lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX
- Scoring 8.5 out of 10 (7), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX


Shimano Torium 16PGAX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX


Penn Squall II Conventional 25N-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X vs Shimano Sedona 6000 FI


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 6000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500DX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 4000-CX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30-Right handX


Shimano Sedona 6000 FI vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000-HX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Penn Slammer IV 8500 HSX


Daiwa Tanacom 750 vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT3000-CXHX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Shimano Talica II 16IIAX
