Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X

Mitchell MX2 Spinning, 3000, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 1530819
Mitchell MX2 Spinning
Spinning
3000x
63.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.14 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag7.4kg / 16,31lbs
Weight258g / 9.1oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

  • BrandMITCHELL
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €29.60
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3000
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.31/125
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW, 2500, left and right hand, Spinning fishing reel, bespult, Front Drag, 10006-250
Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW
Spinning
2500x
62.60 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics6.23 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight230g / 8.11oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings4

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €59.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size2500
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/150

Conclusion

Both Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X offers a line retrieve per crank of 89 centimeter / 35.04 inch, while Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW 2500X stands out for a maximum drag of 10kg / 22,05lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.

What's the difference between Mitchell MX2 Spinning and Daiwa 23 NINJA LT 2500 / JB4 0.17MM YELLOW?

There are not much differences between the two comparables