Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P

The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Mitchell MX2 Spinning, 3000, left and right hand, Spinning Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 1530819
Mitchell MX2 Spinning
Spinning
3000x
63.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.14 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag7.4kg / 16,31lbs
Weight258g / 9.1oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings5

Technical Specifications

  • BrandMITCHELL
  • The main category of the reelSpinning
  • Price range~ €29.60
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size3000
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.31/125
Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P, left and right hand, Surfcasting Fishing Reel, Front Drag, 10711-455
Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P
Seafishing
79.60 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.7 out of 10
Ergonomics5.61 out of 10
Gear ratio4.1:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight555g / 19.58oz
Line retireve per crank88 centimeter / 34.65 inch
Ball bearings6

Technical Specifications

  • BrandDAIWA
  • The main category of the reelSeafishing
  • Price range~ €209.33
  • Is saltwater resistantNo
  • Spare spoolNo
  • Reel size-
  • Handle typeSingle handle
  • Drag typeFront drag
  • Handle orientationLeft, Right
  • Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.18/300

Conclusion

Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P edges out Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the maximum drag (15kg / 33,07lbs) and the total score (7.96 out of 10). Still, Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X holds its own with strengths like a gear ratio of 6.2:1 and a ergonomics of 6.14 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.

What's the difference between Mitchell MX2 Spinning and Daiwa Emblem Surf Light 45 SCW QD- P?

There are not much differences between the two comparables