Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa Tanacom 500
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Mitchell MX2 Spinning
Spinning
3000x
63.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.14 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag7.4kg / 16,31lbs
Weight258g / 9.1oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandMITCHELL
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.31/125

Daiwa Tanacom 500
Multireels
70.40 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio2.8:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05lbs
Weight750g / 26.46oz
Line retireve per crank46 centimeter / 18.11 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €489.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.37/420
Conclusion
Both Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X and Daiwa Tanacom 500 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Daiwa Tanacom 500 stands out for a durability of 9.5 out of 10. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Mitchell MX2 Spinning and Daiwa Tanacom 500?
Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.28 out of 10 (258g / 9,1oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- 8.4 out of 10 (89 centimeter / 35.04 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Daiwa Tanacom 500
- Ready for saltwater, great for any multireels adventure.
Similar comparisons

Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX


Penn International VISW 80 / Color: GoldX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Delphin INKS 6000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX


Shimano Tiagra 50WLRSAX vs Delphin IXCELA AL BODY 3000X


Daiwa GS LTD 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Tekota 600 HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Penn Squall II Conventional 30 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 600 Line Counter A 600 HGA LC / Right handX


Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 4000D-CXH 4000D-CXHX


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Talica 25II CAM 25II CAMX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 3000D-CXH 3000D-CXHX vs Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X


Shimano Ocea Jigger 4000 HGX vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX
