Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag

Mitchell MX2 Spinning
Spinning
3000x
63.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.14 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag7.4kg / 16,31lbs
Weight258g / 9.1oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandMITCHELL
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.31/125

Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag
Spinning
42.60 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.5 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight370g / 13.05oz
Line retireve per crank92cm / 36.22 inch
Ball bearings1
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €17.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofil0.30mm/220m
Conclusion
Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X clearly outshines Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag, offering significantly better performance in maximum drag (7,4kg / 16,31lbs) and ball bearings (5). While Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Mitchell MX2 Spinning and Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag?
Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (7,4kg / 16,31lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.28 out of 10 (258g / 9,1oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MHGFEX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X


Daiwa 19 Certate 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 3000DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa 21 Presso LT 1000 S-PX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Ultegra C3000XGDX


Shimano Twin Power FD 1000X vs Shimano Catana FE 2500 HGX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX vs Shimano Sahara FJ 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 MATCHMAN 4000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 19 Certate 2500DX vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX
