Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Mitchell MX2 Spinning
Spinning
3000x
63.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.14 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag7.4kg / 16,31lbs
Weight258g / 9.1oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandMITCHELL
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.31/125

Penn Squall II Conventional
Multireels
55.50 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.56 out of 10
Ergonomics5.89 out of 10
Gear ratio6:1:1
Maximum drag11.3kg / 24,91lbs
Weight545g / 19.22oz
Line retireve per crank102 centimeter / 40.16 inch
Ball bearings7
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €169.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size40
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 385/0.39
Conclusion
Both Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X and Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Penn Squall II Conventional 40-Right handX stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 102 centimeter / 40.16 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Mitchell MX2 Spinning and Penn Squall II Conventional?
Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (7,4kg / 16,31lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX vs Shimano Tiagra 80WAX


Shimano Sahara 3000S R vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 16IIX vs Shimano Torium 40HGA / Right HandX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tiagra 16X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL


Shimano Stella FK C 3000X vs Shimano FX 3000 FCX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 3000-CX


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LC-Right handX


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 24 TANACOM S 500J (U)


Shimano Tiagra 80WAX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 2500-DX


Shimano TWIN POWER FD C3000MHG vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000S-XH(U)X


Shimano TLD II A 50 II LRSAX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Shimano FX 3000 FCX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX
