Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Mitchell MX2 Spinning
Spinning
3000x
63.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.66 out of 10
Ergonomics6.14 out of 10
Gear ratio6.2:1
Maximum drag7.4kg / 16,31lbs
Weight258g / 9.1oz
Line retireve per crank89 centimeter / 35.04 inch
Ball bearings5
Technical Specifications
- BrandMITCHELL
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €29.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.31/125

Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000
Multireels
73.80 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.73 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio3.2:1
Maximum drag15kg / 33.07lbs
Weight1230g / 43.39oz
Line retireve per crank68 centimeter / 26.77 inch
Ball bearings3
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €622.90
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeStar drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.47/300
Conclusion
Both Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X offers a gear ratio of 6.2:1, while Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000 stands out for a maximum drag of 15kg / 33,07lbs. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Mitchell MX2 Spinning and Shimano Dendou-Maru Plays 4000?
Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X
- A fast gear ratio of 10 out of 10 (6.2:1), means the reel is built for speed and it's perfect for active retrieves, and quick follow ups
- With a score like 8.28 out of 10 (258g / 9,1oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Landing a score of 8 out of 10 (5) in bearings, it feels smooth and controlled. Great when you're fishing actively and want consistency
Similar comparisons

Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Shimano Vanford FA C2000HGAX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H


Daiwa Sealine Ishidai H vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 1000X


Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X


Penn Squall II Levelwind 20 LW LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X vs Shimano Tekota 500 HGA LCM / Right handX


Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT PC 3000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 2500X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX


Delphin INKS 6000X vs Shimano Ultegra C2000SDX


Daiwa 23 LEOBRITZ 300 JL vs Shimano TLD II A 30 IIX
