Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255

Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF
Seafishing
58.90 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.9 out of 10
Ergonomics5.41 out of 10
Gear ratio4.3:1
Maximum drag-
Weight695g / 24.52oz
Line retireve per crank97 centimeter / 38.19 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSeafishing
- Price range~ €43.70
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.4/460
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X and Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X offers a durability of 8.59 out of 10, while Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF stands out for a line retrieve per crank of 97 centimeter / 38.19 inch. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF?
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Big Cat 5PiF
- With a fast retrieve 97 centimeter / 38.19 inch, the reel helps you stay on top of fast runs and cover water efficiently
- A bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4) provides decent smoothness with moderate corrosion resistance
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX vs Shimano TLD 15X


Shimano 21 TwinPower SW C 5000 XGX vs Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX


Shimano 21 Stradic SW 6000 HGX vs Shimano TLD 15X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-XHX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 1000DX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-XHX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX vs Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano TLD 25X


Daiwa Ninja LT 5000-CX vs Shimano TLD 25X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa BG MQ 20000X


Shimano 21 Sahara FJ 2500SHGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X


Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Catana 4000 RC


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-PX vs Daiwa 23 Saltiga 6000-HX


Daiwa 20 Saltiga (G) 14000-XHX vs Shimano TLD 25X


Daiwa BG MQ 20000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 3000-C(U)X vs Shimano Spheros SW A 8000 HGX
