Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.59 out of 10) and total score (6.77 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-PX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Vanquish FC C2500SCX


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SHGX


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Shimano Aero BB 4000X vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 2000DX


Daiwa Certate LT 19 5000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 3000D-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 6000 XGX vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X vs Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI


Shimano Twin Power XD A 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500X


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA LT LT1000X vs Daiwa 17 Prorex LT 4000 D-CX


Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 2500-XHX vs Shimano Twin Power FE 4000MFEX


Shimano Sedona C2000 HG SFI vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 5000 XGX


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2000X


Shimano Ultegra C3000HGDX vs Penn Battle III 6000X
