Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF
Spinning
38.20 out of 100
Value for money3.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.54 out of 10
Ergonomics6.18 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag2.5kg / 5.51lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank74 centimeter / 29.13 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandCORMORAN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €22.60
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/250
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X clearly outshines Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.59 out of 10) and total score (6.77 out of 10). While Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF?
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.57 out of 10 (74 centimeter / 29.13 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Abu GARCIA Zenon 2500 S x vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX


Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 1000D-XHX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Shimano Aero BB C3000X


Daiwa RX LT 1000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX


Shimano Sedona C3000 HG FI vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 1000DX vs Delphin QUEEN MonoDRAG 3000X


Daiwa 24 REGAL LT 1000D-XH 1000D-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Airity LT 1000DX
