Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT
Feeder And Match
3000-c (match)x
63.10 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.98 out of 10
Ergonomics6.06 out of 10
Gear ratio5.3:1
Maximum drag10kg / 22.05 lbs
Weight260g / 9.17oz
Line retireve per crank80 centimeter / 31.5 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €49.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3000-C (Match)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.23/150
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X offers a durability of 8.59 out of 10, while Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X stands out for a ball bearings of 4. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match LT 3000-C (Match)X
- This reel provides steady retrieval 80 centimeter / 31.5 inch (6.43 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Delphin RAYA body


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Shimano Catana FE 4000X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QDX


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 21 Luvias Airity 3000X


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX vs Shimano Catana FE 4000X


Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) FC 2000-PX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 2000S-HX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX
