Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255

Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT
Feeder And Match
4000-c (match And Feeder)x
62.90 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.95 out of 10
Ergonomics5.99 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight285g / 10.05oz
Line retireve per crank82 centimeter / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €47.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000-C (Match and Feeder)
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X offers a durability of 8.59 out of 10, while Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X stands out for a ball bearings of 4. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT?
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 18 Ninja Match and Feeder LT 4000-C (Match and Feeder)X
- This reel provides steady retrieval 82 centimeter / 32.28 inch (6.71 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Delphin REDIX


Delphin ELIXIR 3000X vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Mitchell 308 2000X vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Delphin REDIX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Delphin IXPERA 2000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX


Shimano Stella FK 1000X vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Delphin IXPERA 2000X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX vs Mitchell 308 2000X


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2000 S-HX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 2500SX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 3000DX vs Delphin ELIXIR 3000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 6000SS-CPX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus LT 5000S-CPX
