Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255

Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD
Feeder And Match
95.00 out of 100
Value for money5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics5.93 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank79 centimeter / 31.1 inch
Ball bearings8
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €189.00
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size3012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (8) and maximum drag (12kg / 26,46lbs). While Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD?
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
- This reel provides steady retrieval 79 centimeter / 31.1 inch (6.29 out of 10), good enough for most feeder and match scenarios
- With a ball bearing score of 10 out of 10 (8), this reel feels exceptionally smooth and responsive, an ideal choice for demanding feeder and match fishing
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Double crankX


Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000D-CX


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD vs Daiwa 20 Fuego LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Sahara FJ 500X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 XGX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 24 TDR QD 3012QD-DHX vs Daiwa 24 TDR QD 2508QDX


Shimano FX 4000 FCX vs Shimano Vanquish FC 2500SCX


Daiwa 18 Ninja Feeder LT 6000-SS (Feeder)X vs Daiwa 24 NZon Plus Distance 25 QD


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2500X
