Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255

Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
Feeder And Match
87.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability5.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7:1
Maximum drag12kg / 26.46lbs
Weight430g / 15.17oz
Line retireve per crank96 centimeter / 37.8 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €209.80
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size-
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.28/150
Conclusion
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD edges out Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (4) and the line retrieve per crank (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch). Still, Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X holds its own with strengths like a weight of 200g / 7,05oz and a durability of 8.59 out of 10, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD?
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD
- With 9.1 out of 10 score (96 centimeter / 37.8 inch) (line retrieve), this reel excels in speed which makes it perfect for rapid match fishing where every second counts
- A ball bearing score of 7 out of 10 (4), makes this reel runs fairly smooth, offering reliable fishing for general feeder and match cases
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX vs Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Nzon Distance 25 vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 6000 SS-PX vs Daiwa 23 AIRITY LT 3000-HX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 4000D-CXHX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 3000X vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX


Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa 24 IPRIMI LT 1000 S-PX vs Daiwa Nzon Distance 25


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X vs Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX


Shimano AERO XR C5000X vs Daiwa 23 NINJA MATCH & FEEDER LT 6000SSX


Daiwa 20 N’Zon LT 5000-CPX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 4000-C(U)X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X
