Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255

Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
Feeder And Match
61.30 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.72 out of 10
Ergonomics3.8 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag8kg
Weight440g / 15.52oz
Line retireve per crank87 centimeter
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandDAIWA
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €95.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4012
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.29/150
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X and Daiwa TD FEEDER QD perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X offers a durability of 8.59 out of 10, while Daiwa TD FEEDER QD stands out for a ball bearings of 6. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Daiwa TD FEEDER QD?
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Daiwa TD FEEDER QD
- A line retrieve score of 8.2 out of 10 87 centimeter), this reel offers quick and smooth line pickup, ideal for keeping up during active feeder sessions
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (6) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Shimano Aero C5000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa TD FEEDER QD


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Shimano Catana 3000 SRC vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX


Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X vs Shimano Catana 3000 SRC


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Shimano AERO XR C5000X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 4012X


Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX vs Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X


Shimano AERO XR C3000X vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Shimano AERO XR C3000X


Daiwa 20 Laguna LT 3000-CX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Shimano Aero BB C5000X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa 24 TDR Match & Feeder QD vs Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ C3000FJX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 3010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 22 SILVERCREEK MQ LT 2500 S-XHX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X
