Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255

Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
52.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.86 out of 10
Ergonomics6.17 out of 10
Gear ratio5.0:1
Maximum drag-
Weight250g / 8.82oz
Line retireve per crank73 centimeter / 28.74 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €41.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.2/240
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X edges out Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.59 out of 10) and the maximum drag (4kg / 8,82lbs). Still, Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 4 and a line retrieve per crank of 73 centimeter / 28.74 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 2500X
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.43 out of 10 (73 centimeter / 28.74 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Catana 2500 RC vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX


Shimano Vanquish FC C3000XGCX vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CX


Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX vs Daiwa BG 4500X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 4000-CX vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Penn Battle III 6000X


Daiwa BG 4500X vs Shimano Cardiff XR C2000SX


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 8000 HGX


Delphin HORNET 40X vs Shimano Catana 2500 RC


Abu GARCIA SUPERIOR 2500SX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R vs Shimano Twinpower FD 4000M HG 4000MHGX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Delphin HORNET 50X


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano 21 Nexave FI 4000 HGX vs Shimano Sahara 4000 DH R


Delphin MonoDRAG 2000X vs Delphin HORNET 40X


Daiwa 21 PROREX MQ LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 17 Ballistic LT 5000D-CXHX
