Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX
Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255
Shimano 21 Nexave FI
Spinning
60.40 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.91 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio5.8:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight305g / 10.76oz
Line retireve per crank98 centimeter / 38.58 inch
Ball bearings4
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €44.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size5000 HG
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/175
Conclusion
Both Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X and Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX perform at a similar level overall, so the better choice depends on what matters more to you, Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X offers a durability of 8.59 out of 10, while Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX stands out for a ball bearings of 4. Your decision should be guided by your fishing style and target species.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano 21 Nexave FI?
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano 21 Nexave FI 5000 HGX
- A high retrieve rate of 9.3 out of 10 (98 centimeter / 38.58 inch), means the reel is made just for speed, perfect for speed fishing or covering water quickly
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (4) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons
Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 5000 XGX
Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX
Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX
Penn FIERCE IV 2500X vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX
Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX
Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX
Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 2500X
Shimano Sahara FJ C 3000 DHX vs Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X
Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X
Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX
Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX
Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 5000-CX
Shimano Sedona FJ 500 500X vs Shimano Stradic FM 1000FMX
Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX
Daiwa 22 Exist LT 2000D-PX vs Daiwa 20 Legalis LT 6000X
Daiwa 20 Crossfire LT 2000X vs Delphin HORNET 20X
Daiwa Freams LT 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX
Daiwa 22 PROREX V LT 4000-CXHX vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000D-CX