Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255

Shimano AERO XR
Feeder And Match
78.30 out of 100
Value for money4.5 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability4.5 out of 10
Ergonomics6.1 out of 10
Gear ratio4.7
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight245g / 8.64oz
Line retireve per crank75 centimeter / 29.53 inch
Ball bearings5+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelFeeder and match
- Price range~ €121.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.35/130
Conclusion
Shimano AERO XR 4000X edges out Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X with slightly better overall performance, especially on the ball bearings (5+1) and the maximum drag (11kg / 24,25lbs). Still, Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X holds its own with strengths like a durability of 8.59 out of 10 and a gear ratio of 5.2:1, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano AERO XR?
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano AERO XR 4000X
- With a line retrieve of 75 centimeter / 29.53 inch (5.71 out of 10), this reel retrieves slowly.. suitable for relaxed feeder fishing
- Rated at 8.67 out of 10 (5+1) for ball bearings, this reel provides smooth and consistent performance.. great for active match anglers
Similar comparisons

Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Delphin RAYA body vs Cormoran Cross Water 5PiF 3000X


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 3012X


Daiwa TD FEEDER QD vs Daiwa TD Match 4012X


Daiwa 23 Revros LT 4000-CX vs Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX


Daiwa 20 TOURNAMENT QD 4010 / Single crankX vs Daiwa 19 Cast’Izm Feeder 25QD


Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Delphin RAYA body vs Shimano AERO XR 4000X


Daiwa TD Match 3012X vs Delphin RAYA body


Daiwa 18 TDR Match and Feeder QD 2508X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X vs Cormoran Veycor Feeder 5PiF


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000S-HX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X


Delphin RAYA body vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500D-XHX


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 2000X


Penn Battle III Long Cast 8000 LCX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Shimano AERO XR 4000X vs Daiwa 18 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500-XHX vs Daiwa TD Match 3012X
