Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Tiagra 130AX
The selected categories are different, score metrics vary from category to another.

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255

Shimano Tiagra
Multireels
89.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classExcellent
Durability9.5 out of 10
Ergonomics3.4 out of 10
Gear ratio2.1:1 / 1:1
Maximum drag40kg / 88.18lbs
Weight4935g / 174.08oz
Line retireve per crank98 centimeter / 38.58 inch
Ball bearings6
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelMultireels
- Price range~ €1,099.33
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size130A
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeLever drag
- Handle orientationRight
- Line capacity monofil-
Conclusion
Shimano Tiagra 130AX clearly outshines Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X, offering significantly better performance in ball bearings (6) and line retrieve per crank (98 centimeter / 38.58 inch). While Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Shimano Tiagra 130AX is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Tiagra?
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
- The reel brings in line quickly with its 8 out of 10 (5.2:1) rating, making it a great fit for power fishing
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
Shimano Tiagra 130AX
- With a high retrieve rate of 9.2 out of 10 (98 centimeter / 38.58 inch), this reel is built for quick line recovery
- Scoring 8 out of 10 (6), this reel feels solid and smooth at the same time
Similar comparisons

Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX


Shimano Cardiff 301A vs Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX


Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX vs Shimano Vanford FA C2500SAX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX vs Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Penn Squall II Conventional 40 LH-Left handX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CXHX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 1000DX vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Shimano Tyrnos 50 II LRS vs Shimano Talica 20II CAM 20II CAMX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX vs Shimano Torium 30HGA / Right handX


Shimano Exsence C 3000 MHGAX vs Daiwa 21 Ballistic MQ LT 2500DX


Shimano Torium 50HGA / Right HandX vs Shimano Cardiff 301A


Daiwa TANACOM 800X vs Daiwa 20 Exceler LT 3000-CX


Shimano Speedmaster Leverdrag II 25IIX vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX


Shimano Forcemaster 9000 A vs Daiwa 22 Exist LT 4000-XHX
