Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255

Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
Spinning
29.70 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability2.99 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag2kg / 4.41 lbs
Weight320g / 11.29oz
Line retireve per crank76cm / 29.92 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €49.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size2500 DH
- Handle typeDouble handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.18/290. 0.20/240, 0.25/160
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.59 out of 10) and weight (200g / 7,05oz). While Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R?
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 2500 DH R
- When it comes to retrieve speed, a score of 5.86 out of 10 (76cm / 29.92 inch) means slower line pickup, great when you need more control for slower fishing styles
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX


Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2000D(U)X vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Shimano Stradic CI4+ 2500 RA Spinning reel with fightin drag


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa QR 750 / QC 750 QR 750X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X vs Daiwa Freams LT 3000X


Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX vs Cormoran Seacor Pilk 5PiF


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 3000DX vs Shimano Vanford FA C3000AX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Shimano Stella FK C 5000 XGX


Daiwa Freams LT 3000X vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 20 Ballistic EX LT 4000D-CX


Delphin BRONZ 5000X vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Delphin HORNET 50X vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500(U)X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa RX LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000S-CX vs Daiwa 20 LAGUNA LT 2000X
