Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Sahara 4000 R

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255

Shimano Sahara 4000 R
Spinning
42.30 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio5.1:1
Maximum drag3 kg / 6.61 lbs
Weight335g / 11.82oz
Line retireve per crank82cm / 32.28 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €50.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25/260. 0.30/180, 0.35/130
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X clearly outshines Shimano Sahara 4000 R, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.59 out of 10) and weight (200g / 7,05oz). While Shimano Sahara 4000 R may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Sahara 4000 R?
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sahara 4000 R
- 6.71 out of 10 (82cm / 32.28 inch) in line retrieve, means the reel delivers a steady and reliable retrieve which is ideal for most everyday techniques
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano 19 Stella 30000X vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Shimano 19 Stella 30000X


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Twin Power XD A C 3000 HGX


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 23 LEGALIS LT 2500D(U)X


Shimano Super 2500 GT RD Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa Ninja LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa 23 Revros LT 3000-CXHX


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Shimano Aero BB C5000X


Delphin ELIXIR 5000X vs Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX


Shimano 21 Sustain 3000 HGFJX vs Penn Battle III 8000 HSX


Shimano Catana FE C 3000 HGX vs Shimano Sedona FJ C5000XGFJX


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Delphin ELIXIR 5000X


Daiwa Regal LT 1000 DX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000X


Daiwa 24 CERTATE(G) 2500D-HX vs Shimano Sedona FJ 2500HGFJX
