Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Sedona 8000 FI

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255

Shimano Sedona 8000 FI
Spinning
53.90 out of 100
Value for money2.5 out of 5
Quality classLow
Durability3 out of 10
Ergonomics4 out of 10
Gear ratio4.9:1
Maximum drag11kg / 24.25lbs
Weight615g / 21.69oz
Line retireve per crank94cm / 37.00 inch
Ball bearings3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €75.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size8000
- Handle typeHandle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.37/275. 0.405/230, 0.47/160 lb/yds: 12/345, 16/250, 20/185
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X edges out Shimano Sedona 8000 FI with slightly better overall performance, especially on the durability (8.59 out of 10) and the weight (200g / 7,05oz). Still, Shimano Sedona 8000 FI holds its own with strengths like a ball bearings of 3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing and a line retrieve per crank of 94cm / 37.00 inch, making it a solid choice depending on your preferences and fishing needs.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Sedona 8000 FI?
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Sedona 8000 FI
- 8.9 out of 10 (94cm / 37.00 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3 S SUS + 1 Rollerbearing) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX vs Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX


Delphin SHARX 3000X vs Delphin BRONZ 4000X


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano Exsence 4000 MXGAX vs Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X


Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 4000DX vs Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX


Daiwa Sweepfire E 5000C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Delphin BRONZ 4000X vs Daiwa 19 Certate 3000-CXHX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2500DX vs Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX


Mitchell MX2 Spinning 3000X vs Shimano Stradic GTM 3000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Shimano 20 Stella 4000 XGX


Shimano 20 Stella 5000 XGX vs Shimano Stella FK C 3000 XGX


Daiwa 19 Certate 4000D-CX vs Delphin ANTIGRAVITY 1000X


Daiwa 24 LUVIAS LT 1000DX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 5000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD C3000XGX vs Delphin SHARX 3000X
