Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X vs Shimano Super 4000 GT RD

Penn 2020 Clash II
Spinning
67.70 out of 100
Value for money4 out of 5
Quality classGood
Durability8.59 out of 10
Ergonomics6.33 out of 10
Gear ratio5.2:1
Maximum drag4kg / 8.82lbs
Weight200g / 7.05oz
Line retireve per crank56 centimeter / 22.05 inch
Ball bearings9
Technical Specifications
- BrandPENN
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €177.40
- Is saltwater resistantYes
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size1000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeFront drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/meter: 0.14/255

Shimano Super 4000 GT RD
Spinning
37.30 out of 100
Value for money3 out of 5
Quality classMedium
Durability3.69 out of 10
Ergonomics2 out of 10
Gear ratio4.8:1
Maximum drag3.0 kg - 6.6 lbs
Weight355 g - 12.5oz
Line retireve per crank86 cm / 33.9 inch
Ball bearings3+1
Technical Specifications
- BrandSHIMANO
- The main category of the reelSpinning
- Price range~ €89.33
- Is saltwater resistantNo
- Spare spoolNo
- Reel size4000
- Handle typeSingle handle
- Drag typeRead drag
- Handle orientationLeft, Right
- Line capacity monofilmm/m: 0.25-260 / 0.30-180 / 0.35-130 / 0.40-100 lb/yds: 8-240 / 10-200 / 12-160
Conclusion
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X clearly outshines Shimano Super 4000 GT RD, offering significantly better performance in durability (8.59 out of 10) and maximum drag (4kg / 8,82lbs). While Shimano Super 4000 GT RD may be a budget-friendly option. For most anglers, Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X is the kind of reel you can trust when performance matters.
What's the difference between Penn 2020 Clash II and Shimano Super 4000 GT RD?
Penn 2020 Clash II 1000X
- Designed with a light drag at 5.69 out of 10 (4kg / 8,82lbs), the reel is perfect when you're going after small fish or using ultralight setups
- With a score like 8.67 out of 10 (200g / 7,05oz), the reel feels light in the hand.. ideal for active techniques like twitching, jigging, or topwater.
- Saltwater-safe design makes it perfect for spinning conditions.
Shimano Super 4000 GT RD
- 8.1 out of 10 (86 cm / 33.9 inch) in line retrieve, means it picks up line fast, very handy when chasing quick fish
- The reel scores 7 out of 10 (3+1) in bearings, offering smooth performance for regular use with no issues
Similar comparisons

Daiwa BG 3500X vs Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag vs Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX


Penn FIERCE IV 3000X vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX vs Daiwa 24 Prorex X LT 2500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Shimano Stradic GTM 4000S RC Spinning reel with fighting drag


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Daiwa Lexa E LT 19 3000X vs Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X


Daiwa 23 FUEGO LT 5000-CX vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Shimano Catana FE C 3000X vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa 23 LEXA LT 3000X vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX


Shimano Sahara FJ 1000X vs Penn FIERCE IV 3000X


Daiwa Sweepfire E 3500C - Spinning reel with front drag vs Shimano Catana FE C 3000X


Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX vs Daiwa Crossfire LT 3000-CX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 2000DX vs Daiwa BG 3500X


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa Ninja LT 2500-XHX


Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX vs Daiwa 23 EXCELER LT 3000-CX


Daiwa 22 Caldia LT (MQ) 4000D-CX vs Shimano Twin Power FD 4000PGX
